Monday 31 October 2011

Occupy links

Occupy Bradford: Day 4

Though it started fairly modestly, with only three tents, Occupy Bradford is growing slowly but steadily. General assemblies have been well attended and resulting in very positive outcomes, and at the last count (noon Oct 31) two tents had joined, making the total now five.
  1. Wonderful piece on the #occupy movement/s by Andrew Rawnsley. Last paragraph says it all http://t.co/ziIjCqv5
  2. RT @alexdoherty7: When politics-as-gossip "journalist" Andrew Rawnsley writes an interesting article you know something's going on: http://t.co/r93mvO4m
  3. 73% of Occupy Wall Street protesters disapprove of Obama’s job performa... http://t.co/gtPJ208q
  4. Thoughtful > Occupy London is a nursery for the mind. Madeleine Bunting http://t.co/mCZ47FGS
  5. Occupy Wall St. Hip Hop Anthem: Occupation Freedom, Ground Zero And The Global Block Collective http://t.co/SkgHMYNK#ows #ocupabrasil
  6. Check this video out -- Occupy Vancouver Protesting At Catholic Church http://t.co/XTtg74aw via @youtube
  7. .@PennyRed Far Right attack #OccupyNewcastle (slightly updtd ver) http://t.co/AYICZgS2 #OccupyMCR #OccupyLSX #OccupyGlasgow #OccupyEdinburgh
  8. Where Are the Women at Occupy Wall Street? Everywhere—And They're Not Going Away | The Nation http://t.co/SLRT8WQ8
  9. Education International supports global occupy protests:http://t.co/DbtQURIl
  10. Occupy Wall Street won't be pigeonholed #cnnhttp://t.co/Ozx1Ykwn
  11. Occupy Wall Street protester sexually assaulted in tent but demonstrators will handle internally: Attack comes a...http://t.co/SNidGBsa
  12. NYPD Union Warns of Lawsuits Against ‘Occupy’ Supportershttp://t.co/ZxsoQDUn #ows

Occupy Bradford - Day Four

Link to numerous Occupy tweets: http://sfy.co/LqF.

Wednesday 5 October 2011

A song for Bert

"Do not be sad for what we've lost; be glad for what we've had."


SONG: Jimi and Janis and Sandy
(to a raggy beat)
Jimi and Janis and Sandy,
They're all in the heavenly choir.
With Woody and Billy and Phil and John
Their voices rise higher and higher.
They sang with us once for a short while
Then time came for old friends to part:
But the sadness we feel at their going
Should be gladness they're still in our heart.

There's Miles playing cool on the trumpet
As Louis rips riffs in the sky,
While Charlie rearranges all the chord changes
And Stephane's violin rises high.
And Django the gypsy makes magic,
The angels are tapping their feet.
'Cos no music's sweeter, they all feel the meter
When the Good Lord is setting the beat.

All heaven is having a party,
Eternity's having a ball.
They're all jitterbugging and cutting-a-rugging.
They've heard the last victory call.
One day we're all going to join them:
This earth is a musical school.
We practise our chops playing Top of the Pops
And study the Lord's golden rule.
(Repeat first verse.)

I composed this song when Sandy Denny died, and it comes to mind whenever one more of the giants who walked among us goes on to a higher plane of existence.I also carry with me Richard Thompson's words at Sandy's funeral, which struck some (not me) as heartless: that we had her on loan, and should not lament her passing.
 

Tuesday 4 October 2011

Bradford benefit for E. African famine, Oct 19

What's On TV and radio this week

TOMORROW
TV
00.30: Eyes Wide Open, Israeli movie (BBC4)
21.00: The Fades (BBC3)
22:00: Rab C Nesbitt (BBC2)


WEDNESDAY
TV
21.00: Hidden, new thriller series, starring Philip Glenister (BBC1)
22.00: House, new series (Sky1)


THURSDAY
TV
01.05: La vie rêvée des anges (Film4)
Radio

20.00: Tony Bennett in concert (BBC Radio 2) 
Order Tony Bennett, Duets II, from Amazon



FRIDAY
TV
13:05: Fritz Lang's Cloak and Dagger (Ch4)
19.30: Rostropovich - Genius of the Cello (BBC4)
Radio
19.00 Pink Floyd Night (6 Music)

BOOKS: A 'Toxic Genre', by Martin Barker


The term in quotes in the title of Martin Barker's valuable study of Hollywood's reaction – or, actually, its failure to react – to America's misadventures in the Middle East, comes from a 2008 article in the film industry "bible", Variety. Ironically, the writer was pessimistic about the box office chances for Kathryn Bigelow's The Hurt Locker, a movie which went on to take $12.5 million – the only one of 23 war movies to earn more than it cost to make – and take six awards at the 2010 Oscars.
Barker draws an interesting parallel – or contrast – between Bigelow's film and the 3D blockbuster by her ex-husband, James Cameron, Avatar. He was not the first to do so. He quotes an Iraqi journalist who described Avatar as "the most accurate Iraq war movie so far" and so did the neo-Marxist pop philosopher, Slavoj Zizek, who claimed, wrongly, that The Hurt Locker was basically a fantasy since it never showed GIs killing people.
This raises the whole question of what, after all, is a war movie, what is "real", and -- in similar vein to Aaron Kerner's recent study of films and the Holocaust – the very nature of documentary itself.
Does the fact that what appeared to be genuine video footage in Redacted, hand-held wobbling, out-of-focus blurring etc, was actually created in the studio mean the message of the movie was invalid?
(If the footage of Apollo 11 leaving the moon could not have been genuine, does that mean that the landing never took place? Much of the footage of Night Mail, the archetypal documentary, was actually shot in a specially constructed mock-up, and the actuality dialogue was spoken by the posties from a pre-defined script; Barker does not mention this, though it would have strengthened his argument about the blurring of the borders between illusion and reality. All art is, after all, a lie that tells the truth.)
Rightly, Barker is dismissive of vulgar "leftists" whose judgement of good or bad of any film in this genre is based on whether they agree or disagree with its "message". A work which massages the preconceptions and prejudices of its audience rather than following Bob Dylan's dictum, "I can't think for you, you'll have to decide", can have the opposite effect to that intended.
The example of John Wayne's The Green Berets, which became a pejorative byword for sabre-rattling agitprop, has lessons for the left as well as the right. As we found with the protest songs chart success, which effectively steered the ant-war movement into safer, less confrontational directions, the left can suffer from a similar backlash.
He publishes detailed synopses of many of the films in the war movies genre, which will be valuable tools for any film students who want to delve into the issues he raises.
The book might have profited from a wider focus. For instance, his basic thesis might have been strengthened by reference to non-Iraq movies like Paths of Glory and All Quiet on the Western Front, and also Clint Eastwood's re-examining of the battle for Iwo Jima.
In the end, of course, the remarkable thing is not Hollywood's failure to grapple with the war, but the fact that what is actually a billion dollar industry, part of the same military-industrial complex which uses war as part of its survival strategy, should allow movies like Redacted to be made. 
A shorter version of this review was published in the Morning Star.

BOOKS; A Toxic Genre, by Martin Barker


A 'Toxic Genre' – the Iraq War Films, by Martin Barker (Pluto, £17 )

The term in quotes in the title of Martin Barker's valuable study of Hollywood's reaction – or, actually, its failure to react – to America's misadventures in the Middle East, comes from a 2008 article in the film industry "bible", Variety. Ironically, the writer was pessimistic about the box office chances for Kathryn Bigelow's The Hurt Locker, a movie which went on to take $12.5 million – the only one of 23 war movies to earn more than it cost to make – and take six awards at the 2010 Oscars.
Barker draws an interesting parallel – or contrast – between Bigelow's film and the 3D blockbuster by her ex-husband, James Cameron, Avatar. He was not the first to do so. He quotes an Iraqi journalist who described Avatar as "the most accurate Iraq war movie so far" and so did the neo-Marxist pop philosopher, Slavoj Zizek, who claimed, wrongly, that The Hurt Locker was basically a fantasy since it never showed GIs killing people.
This raises the whole question of what, after all, is a war movie, what is "real", and -- in similar vein to Aaron Kerner's recent study of films and the Holocaust – the very nature of documentary itself.
Does the fact that what appeared to be genuine video footage in Redacted, hand-held wobbling, out-of-focus blurring etc, was actually created in the studio mean the message of the movie was invalid?
(If the footage of Apollo 11 leaving the moon could not have been genuine, does that mean that the landing never took place? Much of the footage of Night Mail, the archetypal documentary, was actually shot in a specially constructed mock-up, and the actuality dialogue was spoken by the posties from a pre-defined script; Barker does not mention this, though it would have strengthened his argument about the blurring of the borders between illusion and reality. All art is, after all, a lie that tells the truth.)
Rightly, Barker is dismissive of vulgar "leftists" whose judgement of good or bad of any film in this genre is based on whether they agree or disagree with its "message". A work which massages the preconceptions and prejudices of its audience rather than following Bob Dylan's dictum, "I can't think for you, you'll have to decide", can have the opposite effect to that intended.
The example of John Wayne's The Green Berets, which became a pejorative byword for sabre-rattling agitprop, has lessons for the left as well as the right. As we found with the protest songs chart success, which effectively steered the ant-war movement into safer, less confrontational directions, the left can suffer from a similar backlash.
He publishes detailed synopses of many of the films in the war movies genre, which will be valuable tools for any film students who want to delve into the issues he raises.
The book might have profited from a wider focus. For instance, his basic thesis might have been strengthened by reference to non-Iraq movies like Paths of Glory and All Quiet on the Western Front, and also Clint Eastwood's re-examining of the battle for Iwo Jima.
In the end, of course, the remarkable thing is not Hollywood's failure to grapple with the war, but the fact that what is actually a billion dollar industry, part of the same military-industrial complex which uses war as part of its survival strategy, should allow movies like Redacted to be made. 
A shorter version of this review was published in the Morning Star.

Bert Jansch - our thoughts are with you

Having recovered sufficiently from cancer to be able to tour USA with Neil Young last year, Bert Jansch is now seriously ill again.We, who have loved his music over the years since his eponymous album hit our turntables back in 1965, but for me the really seminal moment was his still stupendous Jack Orion album the following year.
That was in the days when "folk rock" meant record producers adding electric backing to Paul Simon songs; Fairport's Liege and Lief was no more than a gleam in Dave Swarbrick's ear. I was advising Sandy Denny she'd be better singing jazz.
And his version of Blackwaterside nearly landed me in court.

It happened like this:

In 1969 I received a surprising call from Nathan Joseph, boss of Bert's record company, Transatlantic. He wanted to know if I was willing to appear as an “expert witness” in a legal action he was planning to take against Peter Grant, the notoriously thuggish manager of the Led Zeppelin rock group, for breach of copyright.

He maintained that Black Mountainside, an acoustic guitar feature from Jimmy Page on Zeppelin’s first album, was a note-for-note copy of Black Waterside, recorded by Bert Jansch, on his third album, Jack Orion. I’d reviewed the album enthusiastically for Melody Maker, applauding its blend of contemporary guitar accompaniments and traditional lyric:
“At first sight the idea is horrifying, a bluesy guitarist who has hitherto concentrated upon contemporary subjects singing the big old ballads of the true traditionalist. In fact, Jansch’s interpretations illuminate the songs from a completely new angle. As sung by him, the brutal world that created the old ballads doesn’t seem so very far off from the world of The Needle of Death.”
(The latter being the title of Jansch’s lugubrious commentary on the perils of heroin addiction, inspired by the death of a friend.)
But I had also written at length on the objectionable practice of attempting to copyright folk songs, which Black Waterside was, undoubtedly. In my view, they should all be considered in the public domain. The entire area of folksong copyright was a veritable can of worms. There had been notorious instances of this, few of which had actually come into the courts with any measure of success: the way Chas McDevitt had turned Freight Train, which he had learned from Peggy Seeger, who had heard it from her nurse, Libba Cotten, when a child, into a monster hit, retaining all the royalties without a penny going to either Ms Seeger or Ms Cotten (or not until M’Learned Friends became involved); the way Paul Simon had borrowed Martin Carthy’s ostinato guitar riff for Scarborough Fair, and turned it into another money-maker, especially when Parsley, Sage, Rosemary and Thyme (as he called it) was used on the soundtrack of Mike Nichols’ 1967 movie, The Graduate; the way, when Ewan MacColl refused to copyright his mother’s version of Lord Randall when he recorded it, it was then recorded by the Spinners folk group, who finding it unprotected, promptly copyrighted it themselves, so not only did they get the royalties from their own version, but also grabbed any monies from Ewan’s own recording of his mother’s song.
I had tried to persuade Norman Buchan, MP, when he was responsible for cultural matters in the Labour Government, to investigate the possibility of new legislation which would pay all royalties from traditional music into a central fund, to be shared between the efforts of folksong collectors – mostly engaged in a thankless and often far from cost-effective labour of love – and their informants. Buchan had been a pioneer of the Scottish folk revival when he was a humble teacher at the Rutherglen Academy, and he knew more about folk music than most politicians.
As it stood, copyright was a creation of the age of print, and it took no cognisance of oral folk culture. So if a singer sang a song that had been in the family for generations to a collector who wrote it down, then the act of scribbling it into a notebook created the copyright – not for the informant, but for the collector. If, using more modern technology than the notebook which had been Cecil Sharp’s preferred method, the collector used a sound recorder, then the copyright in that recording but not in the song would belong to that collector, not the singer nor the singer’s family. If someone else played the recording, and transcribed it on to paper, then that act conferred copyright on that third party, clearly a nonsense.
Sharp himself gave his view in 1907:
“The law protects the product of the man's brain, not the thing on which he exercises his wits. . . . A collector who takes down a song from a folk-singer has an exclusive right to his copy of that song . . . It is always open to someone else to go . . . to the same source, exercise the same skill and so obtain a right to his copy.”
Buchan organised some meetings at the House of Commons to work out a procedure that would be acceptable to all interested parties, but it foundered upon the opposition of Novello & Co, the music publishers (now part of EMI Music and, incidentally, publishers of my own songwriting efforts), who were unwilling to part with their own copyrights, which had been attached to the over four thousand songs Cecil Sharp had collected in England and America. Then Buchan died, a sad loss to music and left-wing politics, and the efforts to introduce some rationality into the business petered out.
So who owned Black Waterside? The version sung by Bert Jansch and, before him, by Annie Briggs, had been taught her by Albert Lancaster Lloyd, genial eminence rouge behind the folk revival in Britain. Lloyd had presumably learnt it from the recordings Peter Kennedy and Sean O’Boyle had made of Paddy and Mary Doran, two Irish tinkers, in 1952 (the man and his wife sang completely different melodies to essentially the same set of words). But Kennedy was an employee of the English Folk Dance & Song Society at that time, on secondment to the BBC. Did the recordings he made belong to him, the BBC, or the EFDSS? No doubt all three would maintain their rights. In the recordings, that is, not of the song’s text and melody. Kennedy published words and music of a version he and O’Boyle recorded from Winnie Ryan of Belfast, in his Folksongs of Britain & Ireland (Cassell, 1975), the title page of which carries the legend: “Text ©  copyright Peter Kennedy, 1975, Music © copyright Folktracks and Soundpost Publications.” But since it says, also, “Musical transcriptions and guitar chords by Raymond Parry”, then surely the music is Mr Parry’s copyright.
Also, the BBC recorded the Dorans at the Puck Fair in Killorglin, Co. Kerry, five years earlier. So perhaps that earlier recording established the BBC’s rights, prior to Peter Kennedy’s.
Cecil Sharp noted a version from a Mrs Overd in Hambridge, Somerset, in 1904. Versions were printed by Frank Kidson in 1891 and 1927, and others have appeared in print dating back to 1787. Sharp collected three versions in Virginia and North Carolina, USA, in 1917, and the song has also appeared in Baltimore and Canada.
The idea that collectors make fortunes out of their work dies hard. Sharp recorded an exchange as he noted down a song from a woman engaged in her weekly wash: “In one of the intervals between the songs one of the women remarked, ‘You be going to make a deal o’ money out o’ this, sir?’ My embarrassment was relieved by the singer at the wash-tub, who came to my assistance and said ‘Oh! it’s only ’is ’obby.’ ‘Ah! well,’ commented the first speaker, ‘we do all ’ave our vailin’s.’”
George “Pop” Maynard, who besides being a superb traditional singer was also marbles champion of the world until his dying day, once asked me the same question about Peter Kennedy. He looked sceptical when I assured him there was no money to be made from collecting. I might have added that money might be made by ripping off the work of collectors and copyrighting it in your own name.
All this neglects the essential point about folk music, that, rather like a jazz soloist, each “performance” (if one may apply such a description to a situation where singer and audience are a community sharing an experience as foreign to the concert stage as a producer co-operative is to a capitalist megacorp) is unique.
Sharp observed of Henry Larcombe, a blind singer from Haselebury-Plucknett, from whom he got an 11-verse version of Robin Hood and the Tanner, which was identical to a black-letter broadside in the Bodleian Library and therefore he argued must have been “preserved solely by oral tradition for upwards of two hundred years” that
“He will habitually vary every phrase of his tune in the course of a ballad. I remember that in the first song that he sang to me he varied the first phrase of the second verse. I asked him to repeat the verse that I might note the variation. He at once gave me a third form of the same phrase. I soon learned that it was best not to interrupt him, but to keep him singing the same song over and over again, in some cases for nearly an hour at a time-the patience of these old singers is inexhaustible.”
Of Mrs Overd (from whom, it will be remembered, Sharp got a version of Black Waterside), Sharp noted that in one song, “the final phrase appeared in four different forms. These variations were not, however, attached to particular verses, though Mrs Overd never sang the ballad to me without introducing all four of them.”
One may pin down one such performance on to the printed page (which Percy Grainger tried to do, often to ludicrous effect), but even if the variations in melody and tempo between different verses are transcribed as faithfully as print will allow, they are as removed from their origins as a butterfly in a museum cabinet is from the real, fluttering beauty of the living organism.
As Margaret Laidlaw, James Hogg’s mother, told Sir Walter Scott when he printed some of her family ballads:
“There was never ane o’ my sangs prented till ye prentit them yoursel’ and ye hae spoilt them awthegither. They were made for singing an’ no for reading, but ye hae broken the charm now, and they’ll never be sung mair.” (James Hogg, Domestic Manners of Sir Walter Scott, 1834)
Grainger pioneered the use of a phonograph recording machine precisely to allow more accurately to notate the variations between verses, but this still froze a single performance, like a fly caught in aspic, with no appreciation of the wide variations possible from the same singer. Grainger’s manuscript notes of Joseph Taylor’s Creeping Jane, with its tempo swinging between 4:4 and 12:8 time signatures, is markedly different from the way Taylor sang the same song for the HMV gramophone company in 1908.
We are dealing here with an oral culture rather than a literary one, and this was as true of Bert Jansch’s unique accompaniment to Black Waterside as of the words and music. According to journalist Colin Harper, Zeppelin’s Jimmy Page had learned the tune from Al Stewart, who had assumed (wrongly, as it turned out), that Jansch had used the same DADGAD tuning pioneered by Davey Graham for his recording of She Moves Through the Fair, a composed song from the pen of Padraic Colum, which the entire folk world had learned from the singing of Margaret Barry, a banjo-playing Irish tinker street musician who made her home in London’s Camden Town during the Fifties. Maggie had learned it from a 78rpm shellac recording by “Count” John McCormack. So much for the “folk process”.
Back to Bert Jansch and Black Waterside. His tuning was actually DADGBE, ie normal guitar tuning with the bottom E dropped to D. So however like his version Jimmy Page sounded to the untutored ear of the audiences for both, it was actually quite different.
This was the situation confronted by John Mummery, QC, an eminent barrister specialising in copyright, when he was briefed by Transatlantic’s Nathan Joseph. Colin Harper quotes Joseph:
“What Mr Mummery advised was that whereas there was a distinct possibility that Bert might win an action against Page, there was also the possibility that all sorts of other people might then say, ‘Ah, but Bert heard it from me.’ Given the enormous costs involved in pursuing an action, and the thought that one could be litigating, or being litigated against, for the next twenty years on the basis that everybody and his dog would claim Blackwater Side or Mountain Side or any other kind of side, we left it at that. As the ‘writer’, Bert would have had to share the costs with us fifty/fifty - and they were not the sort of costs that we could afford, let alone Bert. But in many ways it was a very interesting case. If you think about it, almost any “traditional” song that somebody does an arrangement of, somebody will have done something vaguely similar before. The difficulty appears to be one of really establishing, amongst hundreds of arrangers, who it was that made the arrangement ‘original’.” Colin Harper: Dazzling Stranger – Bert Jansch and the British Folk and Blues Revival (Bloomsbury, London, 2000, p. 5)
And so I was not called as an expert witness after all. But the bizarre sequence of circumstances that led from an Irish tinker’s camp in 1952 to a possible legal precedent of great significance in what had now become a multi-million-dollar popular music industry, in which the songs of unlettered folk become the subject of high-powered legal briefs, is a story that begins, not in 1952, but half a century earlier, when the Royal Family’s music teacher saw something remarkable when peering out of a vicarage window.
That's a story I'm working on right now, but meanwhile all those of us who pray should be praying for Bert now, for another recovery from this destructive illness.
Meanwhile, whether you pray or not, you can post messages of appreciation here and I will pass them appropriately.
Get well soon Bert. We need you today, more than ever.